Protected cognition
AI should question, prompt recall and support reflection—not do the thinking, generate assessed answers or quietly narrow a learner’s future.
PUBLIC TRUST / BY DESIGN
Ambition involving young people, data and AI must be matched by explicit boundaries, genuine choice and independent scrutiny.
Read the commitmentsDESIGN COMMITMENTS
AI should question, prompt recall and support reflection—not do the thinking, generate assessed answers or quietly narrow a learner’s future.
Learners should understand and control appropriate sharing. My Space must not become surveillance, ranking or an irreversible label.
AI never replaces safeguarding practice, professional judgement or trusted relationships. Escalation routes and accountable adults must be clear.
Collect only what is justified, set retention and access rules, and undertake formal data-protection assessment before any live use.
Design with disabled learners and those with SEND, care experience, interrupted learning and differing access to technology—not after them.
Make limitations, evidence, decisions and routes for correction visible. Independent scrutiny should accompany high-impact uses.
ABOUT THIS SITE
References to organisations and national bodies describe potential alignment or ecosystem roles unless a formal partnership is explicitly stated.
The current public site does not provide learner accounts or portfolio storage. The response page is a mock-up and does not submit information.
The site uses semantic headings, keyboard links, responsive layouts and visible focus support. Formal accessibility testing remains part of the next stage.
JOIN THE NEXT CONVERSATION
A verified public contact route will be added before formal external engagement. For now, the response page demonstrates the questions partners will be invited to answer.
View the response form